For those who don’t know (and why would you?) the Dutch tax office, the Belastingdienst, have what is known as the 30% Tax Ruling on income for certain foreigners working within the country.
To be eligible you have to meet the following criteria (unless fascinated by the subject you may wish to scroll through the italicised information below, it is rather dull),
- The employee works for an employer liable to withhold Dutch payroll tax on the employee’s salary.
- Employer and employee have to agree in writing that the 30 percent ruling is applicable.
- The employee has to be transferred from abroad to a Dutch employer or has to be recruited from abroad by a Dutch employer.
- The employee has to have specific experience or expertise which is not, or is rarely available in the Netherlands, for example specialists in a specific line of business.
- The application for the 30 percent ruling has to be done by both employer and employee. If the 30 percent ruling is applicable, the gross salary of the employee will be reduced by 30 percent. This will most likely also have implications for your potential unemployment or disability benefits since these benefits are based on taxable salary. Therefore the tax authorities require that both employer and employee are aware of these consequences. This agreement in writing can be done by means of a clause in your employment contract or as an addendum to the employment contract.It is only possible to claim the 30 percent ruling if you are transferred from abroad. You have to prove that you were residing in another country before you came to the Netherlands for this job. The employer has to state, by means of a letter of recommendation to the tax authorities, the reason why he/she hired the employee and what makes the employee so special for the company. The employer may be asked to prove that they did not succeed in finding an employee with comparable expertise in the Netherlands.The employee has to have specific skills that are scarce on the Dutch labour market. These specific skills are determined by several aspects such as salary, age, employment history, education and level of employment. None of these are conclusive; it is the combination of all aspects that will determine your specific skills.
- You can exchange your drivers license without retaking a driving test.
However, many of the general populace in Holland don’t see it in that way.
What they see is wealthy foreigners who pay no tax at all. I know this because on several occasions it has been pointed out to me in very strong language, and with a certain amount of venom, that ‘you people’ come to Holland, pay no tax, don’t learn the language and are an abomination.
Now before you all assume such tirades were induced by some horrendous cultural faux pas on my part I’d just like to set the record straight. Most of the time I’m assumed to be Dutch by the locals and I try to blend in wherever I am. I’m very aware of the buttons not to push when around the Dutch.
The first time I was subjected to a public tirade/ humiliation on taxes was when I inadvertently look someone else’s parking spot. How that related to our income tax status I’m not sure. I was informed I’d taken the parking spot by a man, incandescent with rage, who hammered on my car window to tell me so. Not able to follow his torrent of obviously abusive Dutch I asked, in Dutch, if he spoke English. Ouch. Fuel to the flames.
That did end quite well though, as once I regained my composure and tracked him down in Albert Heijn (our local grocery store), I got the chance to put him right. Firstly I apologised for stealing his parking spot; I just hadn’t seen him. I also reminded him that new people were arriving in the Netherlands every day and couldn’t be expected to know the language in the first week. And my spouse did pay Dutch tax – and for the record USA tax too.
In the end the poor man ended up apologising to me, just to escape.
The second time it happened was in the Gemeente, (Town Hall) trying to exchange my daughter’s US driving license for a Dutch one. Was she here under the 30% rule? No, but her father was, would that help?
Wrong response. The normally calm, urbane gemeente expert-on-all-things-expat went ballistic along the same lines as the previous man. An impromptu rant about ‘did we know how much tax dutch people have to pay? Have you any idea? And you people pay **** all.’ Not quite true as I now know.
He was in pointy finger mode too, jabbing a rigid digit at my daughter and myself as if he’d like to see us burn in hell. A pointy finger in our house is considered an invitation for me to get up close and in the face of the perpetrator; in this case a utilitarian counter was between us and I couldn’t be bothered.
Most business people in the Netherlands understand the process of attracting big business who bring in well-educated, well qualified and let’s face it, relatively high earning individuals. They also understand that in the ‘where I’d most like to live in the world’ rankings, the Netherlands doesn’t really figure. Tempting companies with tax breaks who can then tempt employees here for a few years seems a win-win situation all round.
To see that headline this morning did make me sit up and take notice. Except I’d read it wrong, it was ‘Minister to stop 30% tax ruling for low-earning expats’. A total enigma as, according to Dutch urban myth, there’s no such thing as a low earning expat.
I read on with interest.
It seems the junior tax minister, Frans Weekers, is considering introducing an income threshold of €50,000 a year on the tax ruling, so that ‘wok chefs and pipefitters’ (his words) would no longer qualify. According to RTL news, ‘to stop cross-border workers from benefitting they would have to live 150km from the border’.
Presumably 150km from the border into the Netherlands. A 150km exclusion zone for addresses beyond the Dutch borders. How this would be policed I have no idea, nor can I see the Germans or Belgians being impressed.
It seems the tax break costs the Dutch treasury €25m a year. I’m left wondering how much the economy is boosted by foreign workers being here in the first place, and how much difference it really will make to reduce the number of workers qualified to claim the break.
Seems to be a provocative statement driven by a political agenda rather than an economic one. But then what would I know, I’m just a foreigner.